Adata XENIA 15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive364% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAdata XENIA 15  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel LAPKC71F
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210806
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 22:15
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 67.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 287
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 790
81% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Intel(8086 3018) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4584
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 162
Parallax 153
137% 161 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 118
Splatting 105
103% 130 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 1TB
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.9.V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3941 3865 1500 824 1015 619 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
364% Outstanding
Read 2,200
Write 4,502
Mixed 2,376
SusWrite 1,961
626% 2,759 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 98.4
352% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1252
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 1,172
852% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 198%
This bench: 364%
Great: 563%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P32NCSV1-BEZS 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 27.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 16.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0974
Typical XENIA 15 Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Adata XENIA 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback