Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 20:56
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 236
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 650
71% 561 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2227 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 141
Parallax 146
102% 137 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 134
Splatting 119
98% 119 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG30ZMV256G KIO 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 690 703 708 781 690 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 916
Write 708
Mixed 716
SusWrite 698
171% 760 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 51.3
173% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 365
310% 461 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 156%
Great: 161%
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
175GB free
Firmware: 4107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 250 333 335 333 315 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,675
Write 1036
Mixed 1,125
SusWrite 346
232% 1,045 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 54.7
181% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 743
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 630
523% 746 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 180%
Great: 193%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 360GB
156GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 846 277 75 123 120 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 1,489
Write 641
Mixed 439
SusWrite 262
155% 708 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 3
58% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 4.2
78% 190 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 147%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
146GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2222 2235 2132 443 292 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,348
Write 2,216
Mixed 1,933
SusWrite 1,269
436% 1,942 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 65.7
227% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,464
DQ Write 1,243
DQ Mixed 1,254
967% 1,320 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 302%
Great: 507%
WD WD40EDAZ-11SLVB0 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 160 161 161 161 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 37.3
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 29.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7016 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback