MSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 434%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 573%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics384% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D67
MotherboardMSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)  (all builds)
Memory53.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$522
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 214
2-Core 414
122% 236 Pts
4-Core 835
8-Core 1,660
147% 1,247 Pts
64-Core 3,786
234% 3,786 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,739
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
384% Outstanding
Lighting 619
Reflection 561
Parallax 699
504% 626 fps
MRender 513
Gravity 550
Splatting 296
355% 453 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 384%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 271 263 264 261 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 423
Write 240
Mixed 246
SusWrite 265
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 34.2
126% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 229
195% 286 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$95
236GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 341 333 350 351 354 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 354
Write 360
Mixed 332
SusWrite 346
79% 348 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 48.8
161% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 222
168% 228 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 137%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$147
462GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1524 1254 1245 1192 1158 1155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2,342
Write 2,219
Mixed 1,648
SusWrite 1,255
418% 1,866 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 73.4
239% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1999
DQ Write 1,640
DQ Mixed 1,788
1,347% 1,809 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 325%
Great: 372%
T-force TM8FPZ002T 2TB
369GB free
Firmware: EIFM51.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3550 2294 1073 964 874 860 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,439
Write 2,933
Mixed 2,753
SusWrite 1,602
549% 2,432 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 75.3
238% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 2,210
DQ Write 1714
DQ Mixed 1,984
1,478% 1,969 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 357%
Great: 584%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
32GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 145
Write 85.6
Mixed 72.7
117% 101 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.6
150% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
166% Outstanding
MC Read 64.4
MC Write 56.6
MC Mixed 57.9
170% 59.6 GB/s
SC Read 55
SC Write 63
SC Mixed 55
165% 57.7 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 166%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 31.7" 1280 720 SAM71ED Odyssey G8
Typical PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67) Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 273%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 277%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO X670-P WIFI (MS-7D67)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $1,366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback