bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 18:53
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 97
51% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 99.1
8-Core 129
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 19.0.0.54570
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.5% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 29.9
27% 34.9 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 21.4
18% 21.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 275GB
235GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,225
Write 889
Mixed 845
219% 986 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 13.6
48% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 68.9
DQ Mixed 72.2
58% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 4 60 0" 2560 1440 PRL5000 Parallels Vu
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback