HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 17:54
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 109
43% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 427
38% 320 Pts
64-Core 1,970
122% 1,970 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 182
Parallax 187
134% 178 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 171
Splatting 120
112% 139 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 121%
Great: 140%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1860 1864 1845 1875 1878 702 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1601
Write 1,899
Mixed 1,701
SusWrite 1,670
389% 1,718 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 39.1
126% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 398
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 328
237% 311 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 219%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3A1 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 38.2
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 31.5" 1280 720 HPN3726 HP X32
Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback