Asus P5E WS Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5E WS Pro  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090507
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 11 '16 at 19:46
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 86.3
46% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Asus(1043 83B7) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 4
4% 4.94 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 3.52
4% 5.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 225
Write 51.1
Mixed 70
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 12.3
70% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 56
DQ Mixed 25.5
23% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 49%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
397GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 129
Write 103
Mixed 102
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.24
104% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 86%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
372GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 91.8
Mixed 81.4
67% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.32
98% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 76%
HPT DISK 0_1 2TB
332GB free
Firmware: 4.00
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 68.6
Write 56.8
Mixed 68.6
49% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.21
73% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 103%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
266GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 106
Mixed 92.2
73% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.19
75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 86%
HPT DISK 0_0 1.5TB
194GB free
Firmware: 4.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 226
Mixed 149
134% 180 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.32
76% 0.53 MB/s
HPT DISK 0_2 2TB
187GB free
Firmware: 4.00
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 78.7
Write 92.7
Mixed 96.5
68% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.15
57% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 90%
HPT DISK 0_3 1TB
36GB free
Firmware: 4.00
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66% Good
Read 110
Write 119
Mixed 112
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 2.81
4K Mixed 0.45
150% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66%
Great: 117%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
22GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 96.8
Write 75.4
Mixed 71.8
61% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.21
81% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5E WS Pro Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5E WS Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback