Lenovo 10A90048US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10A90048US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 13:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 509
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
MSI(1462 259D) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 0.8
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 403 331 391 446 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 379
Write 439
Mixed 394
SusWrite 409
92% 405 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 45.8
153% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 146
166% 282 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F641GU67F1600G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 77 32 60 72.3" 1280 720 SECA60D EPSON PJ
Typical 10A90048US Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10A90048US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback