Medion MD35317

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion MD35317  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B660H7-M20
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 20:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 170
2-Core 350
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 677
8-Core 1,030
106% 854 Pts
64-Core 1,210
75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 108%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSI(1462 C97B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.7% Good
Lighting 94.6
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 82.5
77% 84.3 fps
MRender 84.7
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 55.4
55% 69.6 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E15-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R 1TB
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFM31.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2433 2348 1937 103 111 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,456
Write 2,247
Mixed 1,324
SusWrite 1,173
350% 1,550 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 46.8
230% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 1,470
DQ Write 1,259
DQ Mixed 1332
1,007% 1,353 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 258%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 36.6
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 30.1
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 219 60 100 24.5" 1280 720 AOC2590 2590G4
Typical MD35317 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Medion MD35317

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback