EVGA 151-HE-E999

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 151-HE-E999  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 18:27
Run Duration368 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 187
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 605
60% 489 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 60.9
Parallax 87.7
51% 70.4 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 45.5
47% 59.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
916GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0411B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1265
Write 1072
Mixed 134
180% 824 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 58.8
191% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 589
458% 635 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 372%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
455GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 376
Write 440
Mixed 379
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 44.8
147% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 160
173% 289 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2015)-$107
4.5TB free
Firmware: CC48
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 194
Write 170
Mixed 96.3
114% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.3
247% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 117%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB
6TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 177
Write 170
Mixed 117
115% 155 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 3.3
687% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
4TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 139
Write 126
Mixed 63.4
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 130
Mixed 92.4
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.M8FAD 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 20.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.5" 2560 1369 SAM0D63 U28E510
Typical 151-HE-E999 Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: EVGA 151-HE-E999

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback