Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 17:15
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2970WX-$1,383
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 197
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 783
69% 588 Pts
64-Core 3,058
189% 3,058 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 138
Parallax 284
97% 180 fps
MRender 241
Gravity 150
Splatting 207
163% 200 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,193
Write 1,992
Mixed 1326
408% 1,837 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 44.8
144% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 332
244% 322 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
2TB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 468 465 457 465 459 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 469
Mixed 394
SusWrite 463
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 37.1
122% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 271
204% 272 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
553GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 169 176 174 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 150
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 170
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST10000NM0086-2AA101 10TB
889GB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 157 156 157 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 90
SusWrite 156
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1
298% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 23.6
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 72%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 30 34" 1280 720 AUS3431 ASUS MX34V
Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $832
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback