Acer Predator PH517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Cayman_CFS
Memory51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 14:01
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 212
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 654
62% 516 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.8% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 121
Parallax 97.6
76% 104 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 98.1
Splatting 96.1
79% 96.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$138
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1247 1127 1126 1114 1100 1108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 2,253
Write 1,898
Mixed 1,413
SusWrite 1,137
375% 1,675 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 51.2
162% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 520
395% 535 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 234%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$138
361GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1679 1541 1541 1539 1530 1531 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,169
Write 1,875
Mixed 1,634
SusWrite 1,560
406% 1,810 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 53.5
174% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 517
403% 557 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 262%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
201GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 432 445 449 450 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 430
Mixed 437
SusWrite 413
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 37.1
120% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 349
263% 353 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97%
Great: 129%
Realtek RTL9210B NVME 1TB
255GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 760 754 762 763 752 762 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 299
Write 728
Mixed 356
SusWrite 759
122% 535 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 24.5
79% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 123
90% 117 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 120%
SABRENT 4TB
498GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 35.4
Write 37.7
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 39.9
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 106%
WD My Book 25ED 8TB
1TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5,800
Mixed 40.1
1,940% 2,920 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.4
214% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 29.5
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 25.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23" 1920 1009 LEN60E9 LEN T2364tA
Typical Predator PH517-51 Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Acer Predator PH517-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback