Asus 1015BX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive20.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus 1015BX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1015BX
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 07:40
Run Duration391 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-60 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Memory 20.8
1-Core 11.9
2-Core 16.4
12% 16.4 Pts
4-Core 17
8-Core 17.6
2% 17.3 Pts
64-Core 16.9
1% 16.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 123 125 123 124 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.8% Poor
Read 102
Write 108
Mixed 114
SusWrite 124
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 7
24% 7.87 MB/s
DQ Read 43.7
DQ Write 37.9
DQ Mixed 35
28% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 124%
SDXC Card 64GB
59GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Read 13.9
Write 13.9
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 14
18% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
48% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1866 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.14% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 2.5
6% 2.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1.9
4% 1.57 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 40 60 0" 1280 720
Typical 1015BX Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus 1015BX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback