Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220208
Uptime16.6 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 22:27
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 73.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 310
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 829
85% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,082
67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$301
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.14057.5006
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 137
Parallax 244
94% 165 fps
MRender 219
Gravity 124
Splatting 187
145% 177 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q5 ZP500CV30001 500GB
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU5SH017
SusWrite @10s intervals: 876 224 173 162 308 231 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1024
Write 966
Mixed 926
SusWrite 329
182% 812 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 64.1
225% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 492
400% 552 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 157%
Great: 205%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
76GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 153 155 151 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 171
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 154
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 112%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
69GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.3 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 303
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 5
57% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Mixed 0
155% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 22.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 23.9
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.7" 1280 720 PSCCDD0 ParsecVDA
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $994
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback