Casper NIRVANA

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	CASPER CASPER NIRVANA
Motherboard	Casper NIRVANA (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130416
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '23 at 21:05
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 129 60% 97.1 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 346 38% 298 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1B0A 2210) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.15% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.6 3% 2.73 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.6 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.15% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 134 131 133 132 130 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.2% Good	Read 252 Write 236 Mixed 205 SusWrite 146 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 32.5 107% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 195 147% 197 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 110%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 184GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 73 80 79 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 80.7 Write 81.7 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 77.7 49% 67.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2S8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GB 321 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.2 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD02DC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NIRVANA Builds (Compare 855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Casper NIRVANA

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	93x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	85x
Core i5-7500Intel $62Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	77x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	172x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	64x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x

RAM
M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 45%, 1,309 samples	50x
M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 26%, 640 samples	25x
CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 1x8GBCrucialBench 36%, 3,530 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16