Colorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 185%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 198%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemColorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210604
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 21:17
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 146
2-Core 285
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 1,050
95% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,887
117% 1,887 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 278
Reflection 254
Parallax 290
227% 274 fps
MRender 317
Gravity 232
Splatting 174
189% 241 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 192%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 2.1 79 13 69 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 418
Write 298
Mixed 266
SusWrite 47.6
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 13.1
56% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 19.9
DQ Mixed 1.5
6% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 106%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
638GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 436 452 467 478 481 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 446
Mixed 412
SusWrite 463
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 50.2
162% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 353
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 136%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
27GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 138 120 150 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 133
Write 139
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 126
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 26.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 29.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 144 24.5" 1920 1009 HPN357E HP 25x
Typical CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

System: Colorful CVN B560M GAMING FROZEN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $845
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback