Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI (all builds)
Memory	23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220104
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '23 at 04:08
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 71 1-Core 124 2-Core 249 80% 148 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 956 86% 723 Pts	64-Core 1,998 124% 1,998 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8676) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 150 Reflection 158 Parallax 170 122% 159 fps	MRender 174 Gravity 137 Splatting 117 114% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1861 Write 1262 Mixed 632 275% 1,252 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 48.5 202% 75 MB/s	DQ Read 1,024 DQ Write 686 DQ Mixed 750 588% 820 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 123GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 425 432 443 447 395 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 439 Mixed 385 SusWrite 429 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 51.8 172% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 198 149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 103GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 425 432 443 447 441 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 443 Mixed 396 SusWrite 437 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 51.4 168% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 198 149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$150 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1.5TB free Firmware: M3CR043 SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 403 407 406 406 407 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Read 379 Write 410 Mixed 373 SusWrite 406 89% 392 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 49.4 161% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 152 128% 186 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 105GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 105 105 103 104 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 112 Write 76.2 Mixed 74 SusWrite 103 68% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 104GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 166 164 165 168 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 122 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 165 96% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 113%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 29 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 51.2 Write 35.2 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 33.2 47% 37 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 85% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2133C14/8G KHX2133C14/8G KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2133C14/8G 32GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 27.8 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 25.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	31	7	240	27"	2560 1440	SAM105C LC27G7xT

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,280x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,047x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	971x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	659x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	620x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $459Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	419x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	449x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	295x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	226x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	238x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	195x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $982

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16