Lenovo 20T4001VUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20T4001VUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20T4001VUS
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 03:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 162
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 313
35% 273 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22B5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.9 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1451 1595 1554 1957 2152 976 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,362
Write 2,156
Mixed 1,627
SusWrite 1,614
435% 1,940 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 76.5
247% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 433
DQ Mixed 589
428% 561 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 295%
Great: 347%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 249GB
211GB free, PID 00fe
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 21 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 66.7
Write 20.9
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 20.1
37% 33 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 3
169% 7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS2G64HZ-3G2B1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 VIZ0035 VO320E
Typical 20T4001VUS Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20T4001VUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback