Asrock H410M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 01:58
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$94
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 244
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 647
67% 538 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 69.1
56% 71.4 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 68.2
56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD-128GB 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 42 22 36 56 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 395
Write 329
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 59.6
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 1.2
51% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 84.9
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 1
47% 109 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 95%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
912GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 95.3
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 97.2
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST32000644NS 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: GGB8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 65 67 67 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 115
Write 122
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 66.6
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 28.9" 1920 1080 EPI5530 AOC TV
Typical H410M-HDV Builds (Compare 846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback