Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 23:22
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 447
45% 366 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 0577) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.7
3% 2.53 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
AMD RX 6400
XFX(1EAE 6405) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.2% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 79.1
32% 59.7 fps
MRender 90.9
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 25.3
40% 52.4 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 668 638 737 713 722 759 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,183
Write 1,009
Mixed 945
SusWrite 706
216% 961 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 61.1
198% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 538
390% 512 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 174%
Great: 355%
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
40GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 355 259 219 192 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 446
Mixed 416
SusWrite 262
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 50
162% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 344
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 144
Write 119
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 104
147% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 12.5" 1280 720 ASM1240 BOE105HDR
Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,711 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback