Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1882 x 1058 - 32 Bit colors, 1882 x 1058 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '17 at 10:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 156
2-Core 312
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 625
84% 624 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 102%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 22% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 486
Write 332
Mixed 322
84% 380 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 14
103% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 80.9
DQ Mixed 13.5
22% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 95%
Transcend TS128GSSD230S 128GB
90GB free
Firmware: P1025F8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 530
Write 436
Mixed 455
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 34.6
156% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 34.2
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 24
34% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2800 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 26.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 27.7
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback