HP EliteBook 755 G4

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook 755 G4 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8236
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220729
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '23 at 13:40
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	72%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A10-8730B R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G 869 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 36.3 2-Core 59.5 34% 51 Pts	4-Core 77 8-Core 33.7 8% 55.3 Pts	64-Core 60.1 4% 60.1 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 6,195 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 8236) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 21.09.04.01 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.53% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 5.2 2% 4.13 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.7 Splatting 4.8 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.53% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 303 300 301 310 326 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 552 Write 596 Mixed 288 SusWrite 324 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 18 54% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 95.1 DQ Mixed 103 78% 104 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 236%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB 1,445 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 34GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		4K Read 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MD-8 Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.4% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 8.9 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 6.3 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	54	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO35ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 755 G4 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 755 G4

CPU
PRO A10-8730B R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 35%, 869 samples	5x
PRO A12-9800B R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8GAMDBench 39%, 452 samples	4x
PRO A8-9600B R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 36%, 168 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,195 samples	8x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,884 samples	4x

SSD
Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $65Bench 104%, 11,104 samples	2x
MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 74%, 4,569 samples	2x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 36%, 6,703 samples	3x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 2x8GBMicronBench 69%, 13,778 samples	1x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $65

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16