Asus K52JT

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Asus K52JT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K52JT
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20101201
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 480 16,023 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 57.4 1-Core 11.1 2-Core 50.7 27% 39.7 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 119 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 116 7% 116 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M 2,918 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1C92) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.93 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 151 87 66 71 72 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.3% Poor	Read 75.3 Write 143 Mixed 134 SusWrite 104 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 10.3 32% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 51.1 54% 90.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 02FE EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	62	47	60	15.5"	1366 768	AUO26EC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K52JT Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JT

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	23x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	21x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon HD 6300MAMDBench 1%, 2,918 samples	81x
Radeon HD 6370MAMDBench 1%, 535 samples	8x
Radeon HD 6300M Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 20 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 753 samples	11x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	6x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $232

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48