Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 12:14
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 1,059
96% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,703
105% 1,703 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 188
Parallax 181
139% 180 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 176
Splatting 120
114% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 448 427 407 402 400 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 474
Mixed 378
SusWrite 425
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 52
169% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 348
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
49GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 45 46 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 44.7
Write 52.3
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 45.9
33% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 44%
27GB free, PID fafa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 14 25 23 22 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 1
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 22.3
23% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z4600C18 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2600 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 60 27" 1920 1017 BNQ7FCD BENQ EX270M
Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback