Sony SVE15129CVB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVE15129CVB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120823
Uptime14.8 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 11:37
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 91.8
49% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 257
27% 215 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
Sony(104D 90AC) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.4
4% 5 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 4
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11628
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 410
Write 366
Mixed 382
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 25.7
87% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 205
144% 182 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 98%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
259GB free
Firmware: AX0A3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 96 88 95 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 80.4
Write 80.4
Mixed 32
SusWrite 92.2
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC64B8HB0NS-DI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE078B
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback