MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 09:09
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 240
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 774
72% 603 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 185
Parallax 207
104% 173 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 144
Splatting 92.8
92% 115 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 500GB 500GB
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0430A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 408 418 422 422 423 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 466
Mixed 405
SusWrite 422
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 50.3
164% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 124
160% 287 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 114%
Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2185 2179 2183 1958 1497 1482 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,428
Write 2005
Mixed 1,835
SusWrite 1914
459% 2,046 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 76.6
253% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,086
DQ Write 841
DQ Mixed 994
735% 974 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 336%
Great: 435%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
447GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 116 104 121 113 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 143
Write 137
Mixed 75
SusWrite 116
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 F4-3200C16-8GVKB CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 F4-3200C16-8GVKB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 36.7
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 27.6
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 70: 0P 5R 10G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 41% 58 217 60 165 23.8" 2560 1440 DELA0E7 Dell S2417DG
History: Score 52: 0P 4R 6G 14B | Score 70: 0P 5R 10G 15B
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback