Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210909
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 03:58
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 200
2-Core 402
116% 225 Pts
4-Core 804
8-Core 1,508
138% 1,156 Pts
64-Core 2,769
171% 2,769 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.1% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 76
58% 73.1 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 54.4
49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 62%
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
7.47% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 11.6
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 0.2
6% 8.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.47%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 403 417 428 430 427 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 405
Mixed 424
SusWrite 416
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 41.8
137% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 277
224% 317 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1735 1559 1579 1570 1568 1573 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,658
Write 2,193
Mixed 1,671
SusWrite 1,597
454% 2,030 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 85.5
286% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,750
DQ Write 1,340
DQ Mixed 1,478
1,123% 1,522 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 361%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2366 2397 2406 1796 1450 1476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
382% Outstanding
Read 2,514
Write 2,341
Mixed 1,783
SusWrite 1,982
484% 2,155 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 89.8
292% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,780
DQ Write 1356
DQ Mixed 1,502
1,141% 1,546 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 382%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl -6000J4040F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 53.6
MC Mixed 54.3
160% 56.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 21.9
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 142%
Great: 194%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 2048 1081 DELD0FF DELL P2421D
Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,623
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback