| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds) |
| Motherboard | |
| Memory | 59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20230606 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 26 '23 at 01:17 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 49% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
32.1%
Below average
|
26% 44.7 Pts
|
34% 301 Pts
|
110% 1,772 Pts
|
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
100% 135 MB/s
|
465% 3.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QEMU 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
106% 37.1 GB/s
|
15% 5.3 GB/s
|
28% 140 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 64 | 0" | 1280 720 |
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples | 42x |
| Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples | 21x |
| Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $230Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 37x |
| RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 29x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 28x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 127% - Outstanding | Total price: $230 |