Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 15:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 182
2-Core 357
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 675
8-Core 1,280
116% 977 Pts
64-Core 1,698
105% 1,698 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Asus(1043 87C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.84
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 308
Reflection 297
Parallax 326
251% 310 fps
Gravity 255
Splatting 187
191% 221 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,888
Write 4,608
Mixed 3,111
796% 3,535 MB/s
4K Read 84.4
4K Write 307
4K Mixed 127
453% 173 MB/s
DQ Read 1,868
DQ Write 1,289
DQ Mixed 1,616
1,196% 1591 MB/s
Poor: 247% Great: 573%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4400C19-16GTR2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 4403 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
117% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 29.4
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 36.2
107% 37.3 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 117%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 213%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 215%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII EXTREME GLACIAL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,557
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback