MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 12:16
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 97.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
83% 142 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 600
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
MSI(1462 5027) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 144
Parallax 231
97% 164 fps
MRender 220
Gravity 126
Splatting 191
147% 179 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 365
Mixed 45.8
65% 298 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 37.5
127% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 29.2
97% 209 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 103%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
154GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 439 435 460 462 460 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 442
Mixed 403
SusWrite 443
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 43
146% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 282
234% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IMT451U6MFR8Y-AB1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 21.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 50.8
79% 50.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 24" 1280 720 ACR041B Acer XB240H
Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback