Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X432FLC_S432FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X432FLC_S432FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X432FLC
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1080 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime8 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 18:41
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 216
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 424
49% 381 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 15FF) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3713
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 16.1
14% 17.7 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 11.2
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
509GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 845 862 845 840 861 978 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,431
Write 1,132
Mixed 939
SusWrite 872
245% 1,094 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 48.8
154% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 334
235% 301 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 171%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 102 58 0 14" 1280 720 BOE07F7
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X432FLC_S432FL Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X432FLC_S432FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback