Lenovo 20FAS7HM00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20FAS7HM00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FAS7HM00
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180709
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 18:39
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 146
54% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 197
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 5.1
4% 3.83 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV22L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 273 281 277 254 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 378
Write 354
Mixed 318
SusWrite 274
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 29.5
97% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 228
172% 234 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Chip DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.9% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 19 4 60 14" 1536 801 LEN40A9
Typical 20FAS7HM00 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FAS7HM00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback