PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130117 |
Uptime | 345.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 24 '23 at 18:06 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 65% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
52.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8423) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 92 87 86 106 MB/s
|
67.2%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
474GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 93 96 94 94 MB/s
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
ST975042 2AS 750GB
341GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
ASMedia USB 3.0 Device 80GB
69GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 31 30 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-547.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
|
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 67 | 53 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | SAM0A20 S22C300 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |