Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 15:08
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 168
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 327
37% 291 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.93 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 9.8
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.19.B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 1163 583 334 337 336 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,741
Write 1,241
Mixed 1,185
SusWrite 656
269% 1,206 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 48.5
174% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 85.7
142% 273 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 180%
Great: 254%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 114 119 115 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
64% Good
Read 109
Write 69.3
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 113
73% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 2.8
423% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 64%
Great: 70%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
8GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 1 8 15 11 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 49.9
Write 1.3
SusWrite 9.3
17% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 110
4K Mixed 0
610% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 22.4
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 21.3
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE069C
Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback