MSI PRO H410M-B (MS-7D82)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7D82
Motherboard	MSI PRO H410M-B (MS-7D82) (all builds)
Memory	7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221021
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '23 at 14:03
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10105F 14,843 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 122 2-Core 238 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 585 61% 488 Pts	64-Core 598 37% 598 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.6% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 103 Parallax 106 93% 108 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 96 Splatting 89 84% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1031 256GB SSD 1,296 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS103921 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,008 Write 1,174 Mixed 983 236% 1,055 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 99.5 4K Mixed 51.7 174% 62.5 MB/s	DQ Read 642 DQ Write 593 DQ Mixed 652 480% 629 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 223%
Samsung 870 EVO 250GB 150GB free Firmware: SBFM61.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 408 188 107 107 107 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 452 Write 380 Mixed 341 SusWrite 218 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 35.4 128% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 214 186% 273 MB/s

Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB 15,164 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 17GB free Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 144 227 192 319 355 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 160%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MIDAS FORCE-8G26SK 2x8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 24 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 21.7 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	165	23.8"	1280 720	LEN66CF G24-20

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRO H410M-B (MS-7D82) Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI PRO H410M-B (MS-7D82)

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	57x
Core i3-10105FIntelBench 82%, 14,843 samples	54x
Core i5-10400Intel $124Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	34x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	23x
RTX 2060Nvidia $287Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	17x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	7x
PCIe 256GBOSCBench 161%, 301 samples	5x

RAM
MIDAS FORCE-8G26SK 2x8GBUnknownBench 83%, 29 samples	9x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	5x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $331

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16