Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 257%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics170% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive479% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi
Memory48.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230726
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 07:35
Run Duration363 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$590
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 222
2-Core 424
126% 243 Pts
4-Core 834
8-Core 1,633
146% 1,233 Pts
64-Core 3,650
226% 3,650 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 120%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,400
Gigabyte(1458 4044) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
170% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 335
Parallax 254
182% 271 fps
MRender 334
Gravity 241
Splatting 180
198% 252 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 170%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$110
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4447 4425 3287 1641 1633 1639 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
479% Outstanding
Read 3,108
Write 4,596
Mixed 3,291
SusWrite 2,845
783% 3,460 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 105
364% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,767
DQ Write 1,300
DQ Mixed 1,518
1,139% 1,528 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 479%
Great: 507%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$110
718GB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3852 3871 3868 1556 1563 1564 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
459% Outstanding
Read 2,878
Write 3921
Mixed 3,067
SusWrite 2,712
712% 3,144 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 101
345% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,814
DQ Write 1,391
DQ Mixed 1,566
1,181% 1,591 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 459%
Great: 507%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
262GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1554 1546 1536 1433 1456 1456 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 2,588
Write 1,559
Mixed 1,686
SusWrite 1,497
409% 1,832 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 87.8
302% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,810
DQ Write 1,424
DQ Mixed 1,577
1,191% 1,604 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 360%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
256GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1520 1529 1522 1519 1511 1514 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,592
Write 1,542
Mixed 1,676
SusWrite 1,519
409% 1,833 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 89
304% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,832
DQ Write 1,413
DQ Mixed 1,569
1,188% 1,604 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 362%
Great: 410%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 165 165 162 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 155
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 162
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
371% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
278% Outstanding
MC Read 195
MC Write 63.5
MC Mixed 72.7
315% 110 GB/s
SC Read 39.8
SC Write 72.8
SC Mixed 46.7
152% 53.1 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 278%
Great: 285%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 62: 0P 5R 10G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 22% 91 195 47 144 31.5" 1280 720 MSI1462 MSI MAG321CQR
History: Score 40: 0P 2R 6G 12B | Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B | Score 62: 0P 5R 10G 7B
Typical X670E Taichi Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 295%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback