MSI H110M ECO-S01 (MS-7994)

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7994
Motherboard	MSI H110M ECO-S01 (MS-7994) (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161011
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '23 at 04:44
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G3900-$25 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 41.4 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 66.1 35% 56 Pts	4-Core 88.8 8-Core 98 12% 93.4 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 876C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.4% Very good	Lighting 87.7 Reflection 88.2 Parallax 81.9 72% 85.9 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 79.5 Splatting 68.4 68% 85.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 51 52 50 47 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.6% Poor	Read 127 Write 75.4 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 48.5 18% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 12.5 45% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 47.3 DQ Mixed 63.6 52% 76 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 87%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 9.2 Write 2.7 Mixed 4.4 6% 5.43 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 8% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD480E85-3200E 2x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	27.1% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 11.2 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 15.5 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 300 13% 300 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	34	19	120	31.5"	1920 1080	MSI3DA6 MSI G32C4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M ECO-S01 (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H110M ECO-S01 (MS-7994)

CPU
Celeron G3900Intel $25Bench 49%, 6,695 samples	3x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	2x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	2x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	2x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	2x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	2x

RAM
M4U0-8GSSKCSJ 1x8GBUnknownBench 37%, 2 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 1x8GBCrucialBench 39%, 3,657 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $63

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369