Geekom Mini IT13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive485% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGeekom Mini IT13  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 01:56
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 187
2-Core 374
111% 213 Pts
4-Core 753
8-Core 1,205
120% 979 Pts
64-Core 1,838
114% 1,838 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 31.2
21% 29.7 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 24.1
24% 30 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM7A1 1TB
912GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9742
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3613 3405 3350 3231 2494 1245 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
485% Outstanding
Read 3,132
Write 3,592
Mixed 2,300
SusWrite 2,890
672% 2,978 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 256
4K Mixed 103
366% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,864
DQ Write 1,328
DQ Mixed 1,558
1,174% 1,583 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 485%
Great: 506%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AS016G-3200ST 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 37.7
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 26.7
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 MSI3DA6 MSI G32C4
Typical Mini IT13 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Geekom Mini IT13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback