Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660M GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime10 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 23:11
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 67.7
1-Core 165
2-Core 318
96% 184 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 959
94% 771 Pts
64-Core 1,617
100% 1,617 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.7% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 99.4
90% 94.4 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 82.8
Splatting 67
72% 91.6 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1031 500GB SSD
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS103F00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 948
Write 1,311
Mixed 1024
246% 1,094 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 65.6
250% 99.5 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 1,057
DQ Mixed 525
455% 650 MB/s
Poor: 110% Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Netac Co Ltd 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3467 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 41.2
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 22.8
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 109%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 27" 1280 720 ACR0914 ED273 P
Typical GA-B660M GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING X DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback