MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 22:36
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 169
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 403
48% 371 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
MSI(1462 C307) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 136
Parallax 125
101% 128 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 127
Splatting 115
93% 113 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 98 168 102 101 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 811
Write 1065
Mixed 909
SusWrite 213
169% 749 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 40.6
132% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 268
247% 385 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 106%
Great: 255%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 103 104 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 103
SusWrite 101
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
353GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 56 56 56 56 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 89.6
Write 79.3
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 59.3
96% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
164% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 64%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB
11GB free, PID 1019
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 40 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 40
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 40.5
50% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 60 27.9" 1280 720 ACI28A1 ASUS VN289
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 16,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback