AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 21:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 71.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
91% 173 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 744
83% 655 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 20.6
12% 15.5 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 16.4
13% 15.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 840 839 69 52 673 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,956
Write 2585
Mixed 2099
SusWrite 423
398% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 76
259% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,151
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 1,064
790% 1,049 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 231%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.6% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 28
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.5" 1280 720 PHLC0C0 Philips 247E4
Typical SER Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback