Asrock H81M-VG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 20:33
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 85.8
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 120
59% 94 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 121
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Gigabyte(1458 34D6) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.6
3% 2.33 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 1.6
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 74 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 397
Write 301
Mixed 291
SusWrite 99
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 25.8
103% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 195
158% 224 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 HWP2936 HP 2211
Typical H81M-VG4 Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 - $64

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback