MSI MS-17LN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive495% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 17 D7VF
MotherboardMSI MS-17LN  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 15:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 74.1
1-Core 171
2-Core 328
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 865
88% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,154
71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13DE) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 152
Parallax 141
122% 148 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 117
Splatting 94.6
110% 141 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1032 1TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74104000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3082 3098 3143 3128 3093 3064 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
495% Outstanding
Read 3,955
Write 3,117
Mixed 2,381
SusWrite 3,101
704% 3,138 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 76.4
285% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,431
DQ Write 1,273
DQ Mixed 1,344
1,010% 1,349 MB/s
Poor: 259%
This bench: 495%
Great: 517%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 38.7
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 48.4
SC Mixed 27.8
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 115%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO978F
Typical MS-17LN Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-17LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback