Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V GEN3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 378
49% 369 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 351A) 1GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 7% Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 23 32 33 34 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 177
Write 194
Mixed 168
SusWrite 31.2
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 28.5
89% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 57
DQ Mixed 32.3
28% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 39%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
52GB free
Firmware: GS2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 80 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 95.4
Write 102
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 81.3
54% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS545016B9SA00 160GB
47GB free
Firmware: PBBOC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 56.4
Write 33.8
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 44
29% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 35%
Maxtor STM3160815AS 160GB
63GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 65 60 68 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 112
Write 21.4
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 66.1
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
34GB free
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 25 33 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 48.3
Mixed 37
SusWrite 32.3
31% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 28 60 27" 1280 720 HWP3325 HP 27er
Typical P8Z68-V GEN3 Builds (Compare 856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $526
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback