Lenovo 82B5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82B5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 14:10
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 134
2-Core 260
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 795
75% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,025
63% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3A3F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.28.05
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 23
12% 18.6 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 17
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 393 395 400 401 402 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,180
Write 2,127
Mixed 1,435
SusWrite 515
349% 1,564 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 61.6
199% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 1,088
778% 995 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 223%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 33.7
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 20.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 15.5" 1536 801 AUOD1ED
Typical 82B5 Builds (Compare 1,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82B5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback