Asus M2N-MX SE Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus M2N-MX SE Plus  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 13:59
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Processor model unknown
AM2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 49.6
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 73.3
34% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 89.4
8-Core 80.6
12% 85 Pts
64-Core 90.7
6% 90.7 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB
CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 12
Parallax 10.2
7% 10.2 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 9.4
8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Sol id State Dis 256GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 175 192 192 193 MB/s
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52% Above average
Read 253
Write 195
Mixed 206
SusWrite 183
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 18.7
93% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 22.6
31% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
463GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 131 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 135
Write 130
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 134
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.5" 1280 720 VSC2528 VX2451 SERIES
Typical M2N-MX SE Plus Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-MX SE Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback