MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 13:28
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 752
69% 579 Pts
64-Core 1,025
63% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 115
Parallax 120
106% 122 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 86.1
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 346 174 104 63 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 435
Write 420
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 182
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 31.7
68% 136 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 92%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
279GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 400 403 430 308 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 486
Write 438
Mixed 69
SusWrite 310
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 6.4
DQ Mixed 0.2
3% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.5
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 33.9
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 27" 1280 720 AUS27E0 ASUS VG27W
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $537
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback