Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP ZBook Studio x360 G5 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 844F
Memory	15.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230626
Uptime	18 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '23 at 10:40
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-8950HK 14,729 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 188 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 415 42% 343 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 4,738 User benchmarks, average bench 28% HP(103C 8451) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 529.08 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 17.2 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 23.5 14% 22.2 fps	MRender 30.2 Gravity 16.7 Splatting 18.6 17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GB 2,021 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA73H2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 304 308 302 301 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 1,345 Write 1,294 Mixed 1,140 SusWrite 324 230% 1,026 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 28.8 107% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 92.8 DQ Mixed 146 102% 130 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 276%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$300 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 947GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1522 1497 1549 1201 1179 1465 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 1,710 Write 1,382 Mixed 1,064 SusWrite 1,402 312% 1,390 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 35 111% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 139 114% 164 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 425%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905700-070.A01G 2x16GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 22.7 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 17.6 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	55	26	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO33EB

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	155x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	134x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	88x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	60x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	25x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 183%, 2,021 samples	24x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	71x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	51x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 81%, 4,980 samples	35x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16