HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory120.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime5 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 09:23
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2135
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 131
2-Core 246
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 778
74% 610 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
HP(103C 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.3% Good
Lighting 81.8
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 85.4
67% 86.2 fps
MRender 87.5
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 95.3
74% 90.1 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TB
500GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1194 1319 1296 1350 1305 1430 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,041
Write 1608
Mixed 1,448
SusWrite 1,316
359% 1,603 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 53.1
190% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 791
DQ Write 669
DQ Mixed 792
576% 751 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 253%
Great: 333%
Seagate ST6000NM002A 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 200 202 205 213 206 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST6000NM002A 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 203 202 205 207 207 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CVF 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 29.9
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 31" 1280 720 NEC2EC2 PA311D
Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback