Lattepanda Sigma

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive464% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLattepanda Sigma  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 08:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 61.5
1-Core 188
2-Core 365
104% 205 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 896
97% 771 Pts
64-Core 1,334
82% 1,334 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 24.2
17% 23.4 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 17.7
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2038 2391 2871 3102 3078 2900 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 2670
Write 3,187
Mixed 2,924
SusWrite 2,730
651% 2,878 MB/s
4K Read 76.2
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 112
378% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,765
DQ Write 1,544
DQ Mixed 1,648
1,237% 1,652 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 464%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
169% Outstanding
MC Read 64.1
MC Write 74.2
MC Mixed 62.5
191% 66.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 28.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 169%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 164 1 0 15.5" 1280 720 AUS1661 ASUS MB16AMT
Typical Sigma Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lattepanda Sigma

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback