HP 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8948
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230213
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 04:38
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 75.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 260
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 847
83% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8948) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.3 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.5
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EVMNV/256GB 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0513A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,419
Write 1,201
Mixed 900
260% 1,173 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 24.7
118% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 517
DQ Mixed 349
294% 423 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 227%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
401GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 151 134 141 153 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 147
82% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ZH4G6U8DXN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.9
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 19.5" 1600 900 HPN3633 HP P204v
Typical 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 Pro G6 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback